I used to really focus on Facebook as my social media outlet of choice. Unfortunately they made sweeping changes at the end of last year that mean, on average, only 2% of my thousands of Facebook fans are actually shown my content. I still share content there, but there’s no doubt that it’s less of a focus for me now. These days I’m really getting back into Instagram and I would be stoked if you would join me over there so I can share some images with you.
Different people choose to use Instagram in very different ways. Personally I like to share a combination of behind-the-scenes style images, and also some completed ‘portfolio’ work. It gives you a little look behind the curtain at my life and my career and hopefully inspires you to have as much fun as I do!
Please come and join me!
Along with the redesign to this website came a slight shift in how and where I publish some of my writing. My feature length reviews and articles can now be found on my other site, Shutter Muse, and this month I posted a ton of new content over there.
Here’s a few of my favourite posts from the last month on Shutter Muse – click the images to get to the articles. Enjoy!
Since people are often curious about what gear I’m using I’ve decided to start posting updates of various kits that I’m using. I’ll be posting them on Instagram if you want to catch them directly, just follow @DanCarrPhoto. After that I’ll post them up here on the blog as well with a quick simple list of the particular kit I’m using.
This morning I picked up a new lens from my local store, Whistler Fotosource; the Canon 16-35 f/4 L IS. Huge thanks to them for getting the lens in for me so quickly!! Tomorrow I leave for Jasper National Park in Alberta and after finishing up there I’ll be heading almost immediately to the west coast of Vancouver Island. In short, I’ve got some perfect testing grounds coming up for this lens which Canon’s landscape photographers have been itching to get hold of. For many years I used the excellent Canon 17-40 f/4 L. To this day it remains Canon’s cheapest L lens, and quite probably their best bargain. It’s short, lightweight and bloody sharp almost all over. For well under $1000 you can get your first L series lens, in fact when I got my first one it was MY first Canon L glass too. The only complaint that people really had about that lens was that it was a little soft in the corners. Sometimes it wasn’t too noticeable but if you got low to the ground with close foreground objects they were noticeably soft, at least compared to the middle which was tack sharp on the 17-40. The 16-35 is a totally new design and whilst I don’t believe that Canon have explicitly stated that it IS the replacement for the 17-40, it would make a lot of sense. They actually priced the new lens much lower than was expected, “only” $1200. Trust me though, that’s cheap when you look at the last few new lenses they have launched! The addition of IS has added a small amount of weight over the 17-40 but having played with them both side-by-side today I can say that it’s unnoticeable since the new lens is so evenly balanced. It feels wonderful on a 5D Mark III. First reports from other testers have indicated that this lens is optically stunning, right up into the corners, so I’m super excited to get out in the field with it over the next few weeks and put it to the test. I’m also really curious to see whether image stabilization turns out to be a benefit to my style of shooting. I’ve previously shot the 17-40 almost exclusively from a tripod where IS doesn’t do you any good. If it’s not been on a tripod I’ve been shooting sports where you always have a high enough shutter speed for IS to be useless as well. Will I use it?
If the IS is good enough then there are times when it might negate the use of a tripod entirely. I can also see myself using this lens for a lot more travel photography than I have done with the 17-40. In recent year’s i’ve gravitated to the stunning 24-70 f/2.8 L II for that kind of thing, but the 16-35 f/4 L IS will allow excellent low light shooting for interesting city shots and interiors. I have a24mm f/1.4 L II as well, but with a 4-stop IS in the 16-35, this actually allows an even better equivalent exposure. My mind immediately jumps to my time in Rome last year photographing the stunning church interiors…. the 16-35 f/4 L IS would be perfect for that kind of situation.
In terms of unboxing first impressions I have to say I’m very very impressed. I put it side by side with the 24-70 f/2.8 L II and actually preferred the feel of the zoom and focus on the much cheaper ($1000 cheaper!) 16-35. This lens is built to last and I’ve no doubt it’s going to be with me for a very long time. There’s long been a rumoured 14-24 f/2.8 L on the horizon as well, but having handled this lens today I really don’t see a need for that lens other than the “me too” factor because Nikon has one. Such a lens would be twice as heavy as the 16-35 f/4 L IS and it would be physically much larger and likely twice the price. Not to mention the added cost and hassle of having to use giant specialized filter holders on a 14mm lens. Without IS, the 16-35 would still trump it for low light shooting unless you were purely looking for a shutter speed advantage for sports. It’ll be interesting to see whether that lens materializes. I hope it doesn’t in the short term because there are far more pressing places that Canon could spruce up their lens lineup, namely their long-in-the-tooth 45mm TS-E and 90mm TS-E.
Look for more thoughts on this new lens in the coming couple of weeks and stay tuned to Instagram to follow me around while I shoot with it!
Your Next Reading
Introducing: Shutter Muse
I’ve made some changes to where I post my photography content such as tutorials, reviews and reports from my trips and travels. All of this + much, much more can now be found on this new site of mine; Shutter Muse. Slowly I’m going to transition this blog here back to more of a personal blog. I hope you guys will come and join me and some of my friends over at the new site as well!Visit Shutter Muse