This evening Canon has announced the latest incarnation of the 1 series camera, the 1DmkIV
A quick run down of the key specs:
- 16 megapixels
- APS-H (27.9 x 18.6mm) size with a magnification factor or 1.3x
- New 45 point auto focus system
- 39 cross-type focusing points
- High ISO setting up to 102,400
- 300,000-cycle shutter mechanism
- 63-zone meter
- 1/300 standard flash sync
- Twin CompactFlash and SD card slots
- $4,999 body only (US price)
- Available late December
- 1080p video in frame rates of approximately 30fps, 25fps, and 24fps.
- 720p HD video at 60fps
- 10fps continuous shooting speed.
- Dual digic IV chips
This camera takes the newly designed auto focus system from the 7d and improves on it even more in a couple of key areas. My own initial tests with the 7d auto focus have been extremely favorable and I would expect the new 1dmkIV AF system to be even better with 45 focus points.
When the Nikon d3s was announced last week I was personally a little surprised at the lackluster video features.It seems that Nikon is really several steps behind in this respect and with the mkV here Canon has seemingly taken another step forwards. Many sources claim that even Canon themselves were hugely surprised by how quickly people took to the video mode of the 5dMKII and have since re-structured departments to take this into account and push video in DSLRs forwards at a much greater pace. If you want to shoot video as well as stills, the Canon choice is a no-brainer.
I’m surprised though at the lack of ergonomic changes to the new camera. Particularly the movie button and live view selection switch on the 7d has been missed off and I personally found that to be an excellent addition. I’m not actually going to post a ton of photos of this thing because it is almost impossible to distinguish it from the previous 1dMKIII. Instead of working on ergonomics or speed it seems that Canon has put the majority of efforts into making this the best low light camera out there. The proof of that will be in the test samples. I’m sure there will be plenty of people out there that will be annoyed for one reason or another. There is nothing ground-breaking here but Canon has listened to the critics of the MKIII and tackled the areas that mean the most to photojournalists and sports shooters, namely high ISO and focus accuracy. Until we see some tests there can’t really be a conclusion to this. Given the high cost though and the number of features that cross over, i think they might have a huge hit with the 7d which is one third the price.
The camera is already available for pre-order at B&H photo and Amazon
I would agree this seems like a great camera but saying Nikon is several steps behind is just dumb. This isn’t even a full frame camera!
Erich i think you need to re-read what i wrote…..
“several steps behind in this respect ” I was referring to the video features. You can’t possibly argue that Nikons video features aren’t behind Canons.
“If you want to shoot video as well as stills, the Canon choice is a no-brainer.”
And if you think that Canon couldn’t have made it full frame if they wanted to then you are naive. They are perfectly capable of making full frame cameras (5dMKII and 1dsMKIII) I’m sure they have their reasons for not doing so and I’m sure they did their research with the people who will actually buy this camera. Not just with the website fanboys who actually never use the equipment they love to bitch about. Those that really think full frame is a necessity for sports shooting have the option of the d3s. Personally I can’t see the benefits of it for this type of camera
I did misread it. You’re right. The nikon is behind in that aspect. I still have yet to see the need for video in a photo camera though. To me, it’s a waste of resources to design video into a photo camera when those resources could be better used to further the improvement of the photos.
Putting video into a pro camera like this just doesn’t make sense to me. Sure it’s helpful but I can only see it more for a consumer and less professional and isn’t this supposed to be on the professional end of the spectrum?
Acually Eirch, I feel just the opposite. Videographers for years have been stuck with extremely small chips in there cameras. Not only this, but most videocameras do not let you remove and switch lenses. For anyone who has been wanting to be able to do rack focus changes and get beautiful bokeh, video in DSLRs is a dream. The closest videocamera I can think of that does similarly is the Red One but that runs about $18,000 for just the body and is not the kind of camera you can easily run with just one person.
Granted, there is much that could be improved on canon’s DSLR video technology… I’ve found it very difficult to accurately focus in quickly changing environments such concerts. Hopefully they improve the autofocusing when they take their next step.