It’s always an exciting day when a big brown box arrives, especially when it says Canon on the side. This year, due to economical situations in Canada (where I live) and Japan, Canon raised their prices on all their lenses and cameras. Whilst this is always a bit of a blow, they were at least kind enough to let people know that the increases was coming, and they even honoured the old pricing for people that placed orders before the April 1st deadline on out-of-stock equipment. Some of the price increases were close to 20% on big ticket items, so it seemed like a good time to invest in some new equipment that I already had an eye on.
The 400mm f/4 DO IS II was one such lens, the other being the Canon 11-24 f/4 L that I showed earlier. In the long run, Canon’s pro lenses depreciate very slowly so getting in on the lower price now means a MUCH better deal for me down the line if I ever intend to sell it, and a huge saving in the short term since I was going to pick one up at the end of the year anyway. In the next couple of years I have several projects on the horizon that are related to adventure sports and wildlife photography. You might think that I already have the perfect lens for that, in the 200-400 f/4, but that lens is a real beast to travel with. Its weight and size dictate where you travel with it, and how you carry it.
The 400mm f/4 DO IS II is tiny by comparison, and it performs very well with both the 1.4x extender and the 2x extender, giving me 560mm and 800mm options. The lens is actually smaller than a 300mm f/2.8, so it fits horizontally in any of my smaller camera bags. In fact, with the hood removed, it’s not much bigger than a 100-400. I’ll be purchasing the Aquatech Soft Hood to use with it, so that I don’t need the bulk of the standard Canon one.
There will be plenty more content about this lens in the coming weeks, months and probably years. For now I thought I’d just do the obligatory unboxing video, where I also compare it in size to my existing 200-400.
Dan I am in a quandary: I am able to finally afford a decent telephoto lens and have Nikon equipment. I am a bird obsessive in my spare time, as well as Canadian also and am thinking of switching to Canon equipment. Do you think I should? [My cousin in Ireland, also a birdoholic] thinks I should. I am waiting for the 600mm DO lens to check it out and maybe get a new camera body too. Is this a bit mental? The idea of lighter “handholdable” serious telephoto lenses is very appealing. Any suggestions?
I think the 600 DO will be a real game changer when it comes out. Doesn’t sound mental to me. Nikon make great cameras, largely better than Canon ones, but Canon make the best lenses. You should read this, I wrote it last month: http://shuttermuse.com/canon-vs-nikon-how-to-choose/