As winter gets a little closer every day, the ski magazines begin to hit the shelves again.  Always an exciting time of year for me as I begin to see the fruits of my labor from last season.  The first one I’m posting up here was just published in Powder Magazine (though Australian readers may have seen it a few months ago in some mags over there too).  This is the first in a series of ads that I shot in the spring time for the ski resort Whistler Blackcomb.  Some of you will recognize Whistler as one of the host resorts for the 2010 Winter Olympics, and many other will be very familiar with WB simply because it is one of the most famous ski resort in the world, and luckily for me also my home mountain.

The first thing that is different about this shot is that it was deliberately not shot on a day with particularly nice weather.  Whistler Blackcomb along with their design agency Origin Design had decided that they wanted to achieve a different look this year from the regular bluebird powder day photos that normally fronted their campaigns.  They decided to go with a black and white design and so we decided it would be better to shoot on a slightly cloudy day to try and get a bit more character in the sky.  On top of the cloudy stipulation we also needed fresh snow on the trees to make the perfect shot.  Getting these things to come together was a bit of luck but after a couple of false starts we got some promising looking weather.  I shot the image using a Canon 5dMKII. I also had a Canon 1DMKIV with me as backup but the full frame 21MP sensor of the 5DMKII was the best choice for the job for a couple of reasons.  Firstly we were shooting at the end of the day so the light levels were quite low and secondly when you are hanging out of the side of a helicopter you need to use a much higher shutter speed than you normally would for a landscape photo due to all the vibrations.  The final exposure was 1/2000 , f10, ISO640.  640 is pretty high but necessary to get a fast shutter speed and enough DOF in the low light. The full frame sensor of the 5DMKII produces stunning images even at ISO640.  The lens I chose was the Canon 24-105mm f4 L IS because I wanted versatility in my compositions.  We had a number of ideas on how we would frame the shot, and when the side of the helicopter has no door, there is no room for messing about trying to change lenses; versatility was key so the 24-105 was perfect and had IS to help with the vibrations from the engine.

Canon 5dMKII , 24-105mm f4 IS, 1/200 f10 ISO640

This is another of my favorite images from the shoot that did not end up getting used.

Prints of the image above are available, please inquire to orders@dancarrphotography.com

You can also view some of the ads that I shot for them last year in this blog post here.

Screen shot 2010-07-05 at 12.57.55 AMSometimes I get in the mood to do big technical tests on gear and lenses.  I have a few of those in the works right now but for this one I’m going to keep it simple.  Teleconverters have a fairly bad reputation and my first foray into their use was with my original 70-200 2.8 L IS.  I picked up a 1.4x II thinking that it might be useful for getting me near the 300mm mark on the cheap.  Long story short, I tried it a couple of times and then swore never to put a teleconverter anywhere near my beloved 70-200 ever again.  Then I sold the 70-200 2.8 and swapped it for a 70-200 f4 L IS. The newer f4 IS was much sharper than its older 2.8 cousin so I tried the 1.4x on that and was a little more impressed, though by that time I already had a 300mm f4 IS , so the 280mm reach of the 70-200 + 1.4 TC was a bit redundant.  I also tried the 1.4x on the 300 f4 and was a little disappointed with that combination.  So my initial experiences with teleconverters were very mixed and I never found a combination that I would be happy using in anything less than an emergency.  Apart from the degradation of the image quality, there was also noticeable decrease in auto focus speed and accuracy.  But what about the legendary 300mm f2.8 L IS ? Continue reading »

100601_1908_dancarrIf you have taken more than a passing interest into the video capabilities of your DSLR camera then you will probably have thought about getting some sort of viewfinder for the LCD screen.  With the DSLR cameras lacking the ergonomics of traditional video camera design, such viewfinders are probably the most useful accessory to aid video shooting.  Not only do they permit easier manual focusing with a clear view of the screen, but they also add stability to hand held shooting with an extra point of contact to your body. Continue reading »

5D_firmware_poster_march2010Today Canon has finally released the much awaited firmware update that adds 24p and 25p recording modes to the 5dMKII.  Since the camera’s introduction more than a year ago, Canon has released several firmware updates.  The first major one last year added manual exposure control to the video mode, but video professionals around the world were clamoring for more.  Since it’s introduction the 5dMKII has been hampered by true 30fps recording (not 29.97) and no other frame rates.  Petitions were signed and websites created in order to try and convince Canon to create an update to change this, thankfully Canon listened.

You can download the update HERE

But it goes further than simply adding these new frame rates and you really have to applaud Canon for this.  In fact for all of this.  They could have sat back and not added this functionality until the 5dMKIII, i’m pleased to see them taking this approach.  They were caught off guard by the incredible success of the video recording and initially at least never expected people to be using these cameras to shoot high-end TV commercials and even Hollywood movie scenes with them.  The firmware to fix the problem has been in development for many months, and we can assume on many movie sets.  There’s going to be a lot of happy film makers out there this evening!

So lets see what this firmware adds then:

NTSC:
1920×1080 : 30 fps (changed – actual 29.97 fps)
1920×1080 : 24 fps (added – actual 23.976 fps)
640×480 : 30 fps (changed – actual 29.97 fps)

PAL:
1920×1080 : 25 fps (added – actual 25.0 fps)
1920×1080 : 24 fps (added – actual 23.976 fps)
640×480 : 25 fps (added – actual 25.0 fps)

  • Adds a function for manually adjusting the sound recording level (64 levels).

IMG_0157-310x200IMG_0156

  • Adds a histogram display (brightness or RGB) for shooting movies in manual exposure.  This is very useful!  Unlike most video cameras, the 5dMKII doesn’t display zebra stripes on over-exposed areas.  Canon have now added a live histogram that can be displayed on the screen so you can check your exposure on the scene before you record.  The histogram does not remain on the screen during recording.
  • Adds shutter-priority AE mode (Tv) and aperture-priority AE (Av) mode to the exposure modes for shooting movies.
  • Changes the audio sampling frequency from 44.1 KHz to 48 KHz.

Following on from Part 1 where I took a look at some useful sound accessories for the 5DMKII, this week I’m going to be taking a look at video heads for your tripod.  For photographers out there wishing to take advantage of the video capabilities of this camera , there is no getting around the fact that you won’t be able to use your current photographic tripod head.  Normally I use a Really Right Stuff BH-40, whilst this does have a separate panning base which might be usable for panning horizontally , it would not allow any vertical panning and i think the horizontal pan would be tough without a handle.

So how does a video head differ from a photographic one and which ones are people most likely to  find useful for the 5DMKII?

A photographic ballhead is designed to be easy and quick to position in one place and then lock solid while you take your shot.  A video tripod on the other hand has 2 jobs.  It needs to lock solid should you wish to to shoot something statically but also move smoothly should you wish to shoot a panning shot horizontally or vertically.  As with photographic ballheads you can spend as much or as little money on one of these as you want.  I asked around several film guys that I know and it turned out that all of the use the exact same head, the Manfrotto 501HDV.  Further investigation showed this head to be extremely popular and surprisingly good value for around $200.  It weights 1.6kg and will hold a load of 6kg.  But 6kg is a lot more than I am going to need to hold, the 5DMKII only weighs 810 grams and I dont have any lenses that weigh 5kg!

Manfrotto offers a solution to this though….. the 701HDV.  Introduced in May 2008 as a replacement to the 701RC2, this is the most affordable true-fluid head on the market today and looks just like a shrunken 501HDV.  It has a capacity of 4kg but weighs half the weight of the 501 which is also useful if i need to carry it around as well as all of my usual photographic gear.  I ordered a 701HDV along with my 5DMKII which arrived a few days ago and  so far I have been very impressed with it.  The panning base locking knob is somewhat crude but it does the job and pans very smoothly with an easily adjustable resistance.  The vertical panning relelase is via a large knob on the side (see photo) and it locks solidly when you dont want things to move around.  Construction is also impressively solid, and feels like it will stand up admirably to the harsh environments that I use my equipment in.  A spirit level is included on the base and the panning handle is switchable to whichever side of the head is most comfortable.  All this for $170!  I’m a big fan of this head, for the price I don’t think you can beat it.  Considering the relatively light weight of the 5DMKII compared to most other video systems, I think this is the perfect solution.

For those people that are looking for a little bit more weight capacity you might want to take a look at my review for the Manfrotto 503 HDV.

701 HDV next to a 503 HDV

701 HDV next to a 503 HDV

701 HDV next to a 503 HDV

701 HDV next to a 503 HDV


Adobe Photoshop CS5

5d-with-rode-micWhen Canon launched the 5dMKII in late 2008 , the quality and look of the video it produced was lost on nobody. It changed everything, Fast forward now to 2010 and I am updating my original posting on microphones for the 5dmkII because it’s popularity has gone from strength to strength. The final episode of the worlds most watched TV show(in 2010), House, was just shot entirely using the Canon 5dMKII. And what is even crazier about the whole story, is that Canon had seemingly no idea of the potential of this camera when they released it. They never intended it to be used for shooting Hollywood movies or TV shows with per-episode budgets of more than 10 million dollars. The problem that faces us as filmmakers and photographers is that Canon wrapped this video package up in a camera that really lacked the ergonomic features of a professional video camera and the first hurdle is the quality of the sound.

The AGC Issue

On its original release Canon implemented what is known as AGC in the sound recording of the 5dMKII. Automatic Gain Control. This automatically adjusted the record levels from either the on-board mic, or any microphone plugged into the 1/8″ mic input on the side. The problem was that when sound dipped to a low level in the scene that you were shooting, the ACG cranked the audio gain up very high “seeking” for sound. This produced a very noticeable “hissing” noise in the audio track. It didn’t matter what the quality of your microphone was, it happened to everyone. For a year people struggled to find ways to overcome this deficiency. Eventually several companies came up with ways to defeat the AGC using additional hardware and just recently Canon finally released another firmware upgrade that enabled manual audio setting on the camera. We are finally starting to get there with what we need to have professional sounding audio on this camera.

On-board or Separate audio ?

One option that people quickly adopted was to record the audio separately, just as people do in the motion picture industry. This leaves the audio recording up to a machine that is designed specifically for that purposed, and unquestionably delivers the highest quality result. But it introduces an extra step into post production as you need to sync the separate audio track with the video track, not to mention the extra care needed during production to ensure that all your audio tracks are recorded and stored/logged in a way that you can easily find them for post-production. So a decision has to be made at some point whether you are going for absolute quality, or simplicity, and that will likely come down to the size of your production. If you are a photojournalist shooting “run & gun” video clips for news sites then you likely dont want the hassle of externally recorder audio. But if you have an indie production with a crew of 10 people, then sure why not have a guy dedicated to audio capture. Of course even if you have an audi recording device, you still need to plug microphones into that too. So below I’m going to cover the most popular choices for microphones for this camera. Its also worth noting that this information is also totally relevant to Canons other cameras, the 7d and the 1dMKIV as well as the Nikon D3. But these cameras do still maintain an AGC circuit so take that into account.

For an easy way to check prices on the following gear, check out this customized price list at B&H !

Sennheiser MKE400

sennheiser_mke400This is one of the most compact options for improving your audio. The metal body of the MKE400 has a solid feel to it and if you are a stills photographer primarily, you can easily fit this microphone into you existing camera bag without noticing. It runs on a standard AAA battery and from that you will get 300 hours of recording. There is a switch on the body that allows you to switch sensitivity from long, to short distance and it has an integrated shock absorbing mount. The beauty of this microphone is really it’s simplicity. You can easily attach it to your hot-shoe and plug it directly into the microphone input on the side of your Canon DSLR. It’s diminutive size and weight means handling of the camera is not affected at all and it will provide a noticeable improvement in the quality of your audio. I know several adventure photographers using this microphone for its combination of small size and simple connection to the camera. I would really recommend this microphone to a photographer who is looking to create a few extra videos on top of their still photography work. It is perfect for making those “behind-the-scenes” type video but if you want to use it outside, make sure you get the additional “dead cat” accessory. If you are solely looking to produce videos with your camera then you will probably want to look a little further down this list.

Rode Videomic

rode_videomicThe Rode Videomic is one of the most often recommended microphones for DSLR video making on a small scale. Physically it is more than twice the size of the tiny Sennheiser MKE400 but it is still manageable as a hot-shoe mounted accessory as it does not weigh too much. In the hand it feels a lot more fragile than the metal-bodied MKE400 and the shock absorbing mount whilst being more effective, is also bulkier and again more fragile. With the smaller Sennheiser you could pack it and forget it in a typical photographers bag, but not so with the Rode Videomic. It needs more careful transportation and more space in your kit. This is an ideal microphone for someone making videos by themselves, or someone who is evenly splitting their work between video and stills production. The sound quality is an improvement on the MKE400′s and a huge improvement over the audio from the cameras built in microphone. It is a shotgun microphone, meaning that the sound recording is directional which makes it great for capturing interviews and leaving out unwanted background noise. The whole thing runs on a 9v battery and connects to your camera via the 1/8″ microphone input while only setting you back approximately $150. An absolute bargain for the improvement in audio that it offers.

Rode Stereo Videomic

stereovideomicThe Stereo Videomic from Rode is another step up the ladder but with a few differences. It’s priced a bit higher than the great-valued videomic but this is reflected in the metal bodied construction which feels like it could really stand up to some serious usage. Again it comes with a shoe mount and delivers sound to your camera via the 1/8″ mini jack on the side. The main difference though is the implementation of an XY stereo microphone pattern, instead of a condenser microphone. This means that the sound that it picks up is less dependent on the direction that the microphone is facing. If you only intend to shoot interviews then a shotgun mic would probably be a better bet for you. But if you want to shoot events such as parties, musical events or general travel video where ambient sound is important, then the stereo mic will be a great option and the separation between left and right channels is nice to have for ambient noises. On the back of the mic there is -10db pad to eliminate distortion and also a high-pass filter which will cut down on some ambient room noise if you are shooting someone talking in front of the camera. Size relative to the shotgun videomic they are about the same, but the stereo mic weighs a little more though still comes in at a modest 12oz.

Zoom H1 Audio Recorder

zoom_h1The Zoom H1 is a new addition to my recommended lineup. Announced in June 2010 and set for a scheduled availability of July 2010. I posted some notes on the camera after its announcement here. With the Zoom H1 we are starting to transcend the gap between on-board and separately recorded audio because in that tiny, beautifully designed package you actually have the ability to do both. Impressive for a device that only costs $99. The H1 has an XY stereo configuration similar to that which is hidden inside the Rode Stereo Videomic. It captures lovely ambient noises with this built in microphone but also has a 1/8″ microphone input, into which you can attach any of the above mentioned H1-DLSR-T2i-back_no_wire-web-162x300microphones to suit your shooting situation. Because it is a standalone recorder you can position it anywhere away from the camera wile it is recording, but you will need to sync the audio track in post production. This is the first step towards getting truly professional sounding audio though. What is really great about the H1 though, is that you also have the option to record the sound directly to your camera just as you can with all the microphones already mentioned above. You simply run a stereo cable from the output of the H1, into the mic input on your camera. So with this you have the best of both worlds. The option to go separate when you have the time to do so, and the option to go with a more “run and gun ” style when you need to deliver a final video on a deadline. There is also an advantage to doing both at the same time. Recording the audio to the H1 and ontot the camera at the same time means that when you come to sync the tracks in post, you have a very clean track already embedded into the video. This makes it much easier to sync the higher quality track from the H1. You also have a great little ambient stereo recorder if you are a stills photographer of journalist wishing to put together a multimedia slideshow of some sort.

Zoom H4N Handy Recorder

h4nAnother step up the ladder and we get to the Zoom H4N recorder. This takes all the features of the H1 and then adds a ton more, as well as 2 XLR inputs for professional grade audio gear. Whilst you can record directly to the camera using the H4N, it really comes into its own when used as a separate recorder. The built-in stereo microphones capture beautifully toned audio and work very well for ambient noise, and even interviews where the subject is close to the recorder. But the main reason you would upgrade to an H4N is that it is capable of 4-track recording, mixing the on-board mic with up to 2 more microphones plugged in via XLR inputs. So you could simultaneously record audio from say a shotgun mic, a lapel mic on an interviewee and the internal mic and mix the whole lot down to a stereo track that you can sync to your video in post production. You can also choose to disable the on-board mic and just go with what you have plugged in to the XLR ports too. The H4N has more options that you will probably ever learn how to use and allows recording of audio in several formats and bit-rates to suit your needs. Lots of people are using the H4N plugged directly into the camera for quick audio improvement directly onto the video track. The built in XY stereo mic is leagues ahead of the mic inside the camera. But then when you want to break out and do separate audio, you can plug in all sorts of XLR mics and mix them all to your liking within the menu system of the H4N whilst monitoring the recording through the headphone output. This is another advantage, the Canon DSLRs give you no way to monitor the audio that you are recording. For the features this unit provides, it is a steal at $300 and there is a good reason why these have been selling like hot-cakes since the introduction of the 5d.

Rode NTG-2 Shotgun

Rode_NTG2If you really want to step into the world of professional audio then you are going to be looking at microphones that use the pro standard XLR cables. None of the current Canon cameras have XLR inputs on them so if you go down this route then you will either need something like the fantastic Zoom H4N detailed above, or one of the XLR mixers detailed a little bit further down the page. Once you step into the XLR arena you will notice a slight price increase, but with it comes the solidity that you would hope for in a pro-grade product, especially with the Rode mics. Still at the lower end of the XLR spectrum in terms of price, the NTG-2 is a real workhorse mic that provides excellent value for money. It can either be battery powered or phantom powered there are some good value starter kits out there for it which include all the necessary clamps, dead cats and rubber mounts. In physical terms it is still pretty small though and perfectly usable mounted to the top of the camera with something like a Juicedlink on the bottom of the camera. I would recommend this to someone making documentary or news style productions if they are working on their own because the size and weight of the mic is not prohibitive. There is also an even smaller NTG-1 version that lacks the NTG-2′s ability to be powered by 1 AA battery. Personally I think the slightly larger size of the NTG-2 is worth it to keep it compatible with any setup.

BeachTek DXA-5Da

5d_with_camera_darker_25_496_450The BeachTek DXA-5Da is a microphone control system that was designed specifically with DSLR video making in mind. It attempts to fill in all the gaps left by Canon and provide professional sounding audio right onto the video track that is recorded in camera. As you can see from the photo on the left it has 2 XLR inputs for attaching whatever microphone suits the occasion. It also has a screen to show you the recording levels from the 2 inputs and has a headphone monitor so that you can hear what you are getting. It does not have any sort of internal recording system like the Zoom H4N, it needs to be plugged into the camera in order to record the audio. This makes it way less complicated during editing, as the audio is there already but you lose some of the freedoms of placement you get by having a totally separate system. If you are trying to make a professional level production with a small crew, or even on your own then something like the BeachTek or the Juicedlink will go a long way to simplifying the process. The DXA-5Da also contains a system that defeats the AGC in the Canon cameras. This is a must have feature if you are shooting audio straight on to the 7d or the 1dmkIV but less so on the 5d now that it has manual audio controls anyway via firmware upgrade. Still though, it allows you to leave the 5d audio set to auto and that saves you having to mess around in the menu system calibrating the manual levels. Still a nice feature to have. In terms of quality, its generally regarded that the similar Juicedlink DT454 sounds a little bit better than the BeachTek but it does cost more than $100 more. Also worth noting is that the DXA-5Da does not have phantom power which means that your XLR microphones will have to come with their own power supply, whilst the DT454 has phantom power built in.

Juicedlink DT454

canon_5d_dt454_d_60_s_411_427The Juicedlink DT454 is similar in function to the above mentioned BeachTek, albeit in a package that doesn’t immediately look quite so aesthetically appealing. It’s worth nothing that you don’t have to mount these things underneath your camera as they are in the photos, they can just as easily be attached to a shoulder rig or something like that. The DT454 includes phantom power unlike the DXA-5Da but other than than the feature list is basically the same. AGC disable, 2 XLR inputs, recording level lights, headphone monitor port. The DT454 also adds the ability to mix in 2 more microphones via 1/8″ jacks so you can effectively mix up to 4 mic inputs down into the stereo output. The DT454 is more expensive than the Beachtek, but it does deliver a cleaner sound. As a nice extra feature, one of the 1/8″ inputs can also be used as a playback monitor so you can listen to the sound after you have recorded it by running a cable from the camera output into the DT454 and monitoring the recorded audio via the headphone monitor.

PluralEyes and DualEyes

mainProduct copyIf you decide to go down the separate audio route then you can save yourself hours of work by budgeting this handy piece of software into the equation. PluralEyes from Singular Software is a plug-in for Final Cut,Vegas or Premiere that automates the process of syncing your separately recorded audio track, and your video track. It can literally save you hours on every shoot you do. Well worth the $150 asking price. NB : Singular has also just released information on a new standalone program called DualEyes. This program runs on its own, not as part of Final Cut which means that you do not need to be a pro who is editing with pro software. Now you can edit your footage in iMovie or another consumer product , but still have the sound quality that separate recording affords. There is a nice demo of DualEyes posted on the Singular website and if you are interested it is well worth a look. Audio recording and syncing can sound like a huge and daunting task, but the guys at Singular seem dedicated to making this procedure as simple as possible.

If you are looking for a good way to mount various audio devices to you DSLR then you should also check out my review of the IKAN Cheese Stick JR and 10″ Articulating Arm HERE. With these 2 products you can easily mount a shotgun mic or lavalier receiver to your camera, as well as LCD monitors.

Please also have a look at PART II of my accessory guide which takes a look at video tripod heads.

For more articles and reviews check out the index page.

© 2010 Dan Carr Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha